The point of equilibrium
"Placed in a gutter point is something inappropriate perhaps frowned upon, it seems little participatory, it gives rise to a feeling of not wanting to belong to a specific definition, ending with result target direct from both ends. Is fundamental understand that the position intermediate is the best option for the evaluation and the exercise, because allows in a time given the Faculty of fluctuate towards any of them opposite and enables adjust nuances. This is a deformation about the idea of the balance and the forbearance in concordance with the life. In practice it is difficult to escape the option position in one of the corporals. Participate in an option or another when both have fiercely and totally different approach seems to be usual, but... what happens when what is chosen is the intermediate point, without opposites? Isn't it easier to close positions when the Poles are not to be completely opposite...? Why then we strive in lengthened the distances? It can be balanced, take part in half-measures? Be neutral or choose an alternative intermediate in certain aspects it is be task arduous of hold.
"The best option is always located at the point of equilibrium, but it turns out to be a very unstable position." The biggest drawback of trying to sustain a choice of weight on the thin filament of a profile located at an intermediate point between two options, is that in reality you do not participate never completely none of them and as a result of the two as a result be outlawed."
.jpg)
